Robinhood or SoFi? A Case Study Using Duo Gravity Network Model

When investors ask whether to choose Robinhood ($HOOD) or SoFi ($SOFI), traditional chart reading often provides limited insights.

Looking at price charts over the past two weeks, both stocks display remarkably similar patterns, making it difficult to determine which has stronger momentum. This is where KnotCord's gravity network model provides a decisive edge.

Duo Network Comparison: $HOOD vs $SOFI

Let's compare two networks centered on each stock as of November 10, 2025: Network 1 ($HOOD) versus Network 2 ($SOFI).

New Nodes (in Network 2 / $SOFI only): 16

  • B
  • GRAB
  • HL
  • HOOD
  • HYG-ETF
  • KGC
  • LLY
  • LYFT
  • NEM
  • ONDS
  • PCG
  • PL
  • PSLV-ETF
  • RIVN
  • SNAP
  • VNUE
  • WBD
  • XOM

Disappeared Nodes (in Network 1 / $HOOD only): 16

  • ASTS
  • BABA
  • CIFR
  • CLSK
  • CRM
  • DIA-ETF
  • IREN
  • MARA
  • MGTI
  • PANW
  • PFE
  • RIOT
  • SMH-ETF
  • SOFI
  • SOXX-ETF
  • TSM
  • UNH
  • VINC

Network Composition Insights:

  • Shared Foundation: Both networks share 48 common nodes, representing the core market floor for fintech stocks.
  • $HOOD's Crypto & Tech Focus: Network 1 includes strong crypto mining stocks (MARA, RIOT, CIFR, CLSK, IREN, MGTI) and semiconductor ETFs (SMH, SOXX), suggesting institutional investors view HOOD as more aligned with tech innovation and crypto trading.
  • $SOFI's Traditional Finance Exposure: Network 2 includes energy (XOM), precious metals (NEM, KGC, HL, PSLV), and traditional corporate bonds (HYG), indicating SOFI's positioning toward more established financial sectors.

Shared Nodes: Force Comparison Analysis

Below are the 48 stocks shared by both networks, ranked by their gravitational force in Network 1 ($HOOD). The force metrics reveal which stocks have stronger connections to each fintech company.

← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
Symbol Type Force 1 ($HOOD) Force 2 ($SOFI) Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank Change
TQQQ ETF 838.497 193.563 1 1 -
TSLA EQUITY 600.975 147.195 2 3 ↓1
SPY ETF 401.631 103.247 3 5 ↓2
AMD EQUITY 316.17 79.753 4 8 ↓4
QQQ ETF 303.661 86.489 5 7 ↓2
NVDA EQUITY 272.014 120.167 6 4 ↑2
AAPL EQUITY 189.565 77.629 7 10 ↓3
SOXL ETF 162.634 102.848 8 6 ↑2
APLD EQUITY 160.151 63.383 9 16 ↓7
INTC EQUITY 138.848 78.5 11 9 ↑2
RGTI EQUITY 132.91 49.8 12 21 ↓9
GOOGL EQUITY 126.262 66.669 13 13 -
PLTR EQUITY 122.454 66.179 14 14 -
RKLB EQUITY 111.685 35.006 15 38 ↓23
MU EQUITY 108.455 70.792 16 12 ↑4
XLF ETF 104.543 52.416 17 19 ↓2
IWM ETF 90.386 31.257 18 44 ↓26
FXI ETF 89.692 59.281 19 17 ↑2
GLD ETF 86.972 39.572 20 33 ↓13
AMZN EQUITY 85.646 46.04 21 25 ↓4
GOOG EQUITY 85.55 48.345 22 23 ↓1
XLK ETF 82.405 31.898 23 42 ↓19
IONQ EQUITY 79.599 28.133 24 52 ↓28
SLV ETF 79.533 71.17 25 11 ↑14
BAC EQUITY 75.75 51.364 26 20 ↑6
SGOV ETF 74.293 37.484 27 35 ↓8
OPEN EQUITY 73.758 65.664 28 15 ↑13
LQD ETF 72.289 25.464 29 64 ↓35
EEM ETF 71.372 40.425 30 32 ↓2
HYG ETF 67.224 26.067 32 62 ↓30
KWEB ETF 66.444 25.58 33 63 ↓30
SOUN EQUITY 64.949 28.637 34 50 ↓16
NU EQUITY 63.796 44.763 35 27 ↑8
HPE EQUITY 62.878 46.242 36 24 ↑12
AVGO EQUITY 61.598 27.051 37 59 ↓22
VOO ETF 61.084 28.288 38 51 ↓13
XBI ETF 61.004 27.8 39 53 ↓14
LRCX EQUITY 59.699 34.559 41 39 ↑2
WULF EQUITY 58.843 37.56 42 34 ↑8
IVV ETF 58.246 27.567 43 55 ↓12
GDX ETF 56.511 43.474 44 28 ↑16
APP EQUITY 54.864 28.768 45 48 ↓3
MRVL EQUITY 53.313 32.209 46 41 ↑5
BIL ETF 51.082 27.337 49 57 ↓8
GLW EQUITY 50.742 26.969 50 60 ↓10
SCHX ETF 48.344 46.003 54 26 ↑28
XLV ETF 48.048 28.889 56 47 ↑9
WBD EQUITY 46.247 35.724 60 37 ↑23
Comparative Force Analysis: $HOOD vs $SOFI Networks (Nov 10, 2025)

Key Performance Indicators:

  • $HOOD's Dominant Position: TQQQ (3x leveraged Nasdaq ETF) tops HOOD's network with a massive force of 838.5, showing 4.3x stronger gravitational pull than in SOFI's network, indicating HOOD's deep integration with aggressive tech growth strategies.
  • $HOOD's Tech Strength: TSLA demonstrates 4.1x stronger gravitational force in HOOD's network (601.0 vs 147.2), while NVDA shows strong presence at rank 6 with force 272.0, confirming HOOD's significantly stronger institutional connections with innovative tech companies.
  • $SOFI's AI Balance: Semiconductor ETF SOXL maintains similar strength in both networks (rank 8 in HOOD vs rank 6 in SOFI), suggesting SOFI has more balanced AI infrastructure exposure.
  • Market Breadth: HOOD demonstrates stronger gravitational forces across quantum computing (IONQ rank 24, RGTI rank 12), space tech (RKLB rank 15), and crypto-adjacent stocks (APLD rank 9), indicating broader institutional support for high-growth sectors.

Key Takeaways

Despite SOFI showing a higher daily gain (8.26% vs 4.23%), the gravity network model reveals that the market holds more positive institutional positioning toward Robinhood.

HOOD demonstrates stronger gravitational forces with high-growth technology sectors and maintains a more robust network structure.

KnotCord's gravity model provides a novel analytical perspective that sharpens your investment edge beyond simple price action.